Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/4374/2025 of UGRASEN GODARA S/O SHRI MANIRAM, Vs STATE OF RAJATHAN on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4374/2025 CNR: RJHC020594592025 | URN: CRLMP / 10063U / 2025 Ugrasen Godara S/o Shri Maniram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Dablirathan Tehsil And District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:32686]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4374/2025
CNR: RJHC020594592025 | URN: CRLMP / 10063U / 2025
Ugrasen Godara S/o Shri Maniram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Dablirathan Tehsil And District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajathan, Through PP
2.
Shyamsundar S/o Late Parmanand, R/o Flat No. 402, Roshan Residency, Opposite Las Vegas Hotel, Shankar Marg, Jaipur District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Shashank Pancholi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP
Mr. Rachit Sharma, for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.268/2020 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that money dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. It is submitted that on account of compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. The copy of compromise has been annexed with this petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:32686] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4374/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 08.04.2026 received from the SHO, Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur (South). According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.268/2020 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 213/CHARU SONI