Rajasthan High Court
CW/14826/2022 of ANURAG BANSAL SON OF SHRI RAMGOPAL BANSAL Vs BHEEM YADAV SON OF LATE SHRI BHANWARLAL JI on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14826/2022 CNR: RJHC020793762022 | URN: CW / 29637U / 2022 Anurag Bansal Son Of Shri Ramgopal Bansal, Resident Of Iklera Road, Near Pwd Office, Chheepa Barod, District- Baran ----Petitioner Versus 1 Bheem Yadav Son Of Late
[2026:RJ-JP:32582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14826/2022
CNR: RJHC020793762022 | URN: CW / 29637U / 2022
Anurag Bansal Son Of Shri Ramgopal Bansal, Resident Of Iklera Road, Near Pwd Office, Chheepa Barod, District- Baran
----Petitioner
Versus
Bheem Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhanwarlal Ji, Resident Of House No.4-B-8, Talwandi, Kota (Rajasthan)
Chetan Yadav Son Of Shri Bheem Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhanwarlal Ji, Resident Of House No.4-B-8, Talwandi, Kota (Rajasthan)
Sub-Registrar-Ii, Kota
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Alok Chaturvedi
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. It has been submitted that petitioner filed a civil suit for possession and permanent injunction, which has been registered as Civil Suit No. 201/2021 and pending before the Additional District Judge No.4, Kota. Thereafter, respondents filed another civil suit for declaration of the power of attorney dated 13.04.2021 as null and void which came to be registered as CIS No.179/2021 pending before the Court of Additional District Judge No.3, Kota.
2. It has been submitted that thereafter, petitioner filed an application under Section 10 CPC, seeking stay of the civil suit filed by respondents but application has been dismissed vide order dated 27.08.2022 whereagainst this writ petition has been filed.
[2026:RJ-JP:32582] (2 of 2) [CW-14826/2022]
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at least, since the subject matter of both the suits are interlinked, hence, if the proceedings of subsequent suits are not stayed under Section 10 CPC, both the suits should be tried together by one Court.
4. In that view of matter, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the District Judge, Kota.
5. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with above liberty.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Pcg/7/RACHNA