Rajasthan High Court
CW/11964/2026 of MRS. MAYA DEVI W/O MR. LAXMINARAYAN Vs RAMPRAKASH RAWAT S/O SHRI JOHRI LAL RAWAT on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11964/2026 CNR: RJHC020603522026 | URN: CW / 26473U / 2026 Mrs. Maya Devi W/o Mr. Laxminarayan, Resident Of Plot No. D- 29, South Part, Model Town, D-Block, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan State. ----Petitioner Versus 1.
[2026:RJ-JP:32541]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11964/2026
CNR: RJHC020603522026 | URN: CW / 26473U / 2026
Mrs. Maya Devi W/o Mr. Laxminarayan, Resident Of Plot No. D- 29, South Part, Model Town, D-Block, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan State.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Ramprakash Rawat S/o Shri Johri Lal Rawat, Aged About 66 Years
2.
Mrs. Manju Rawat W/o Mr. Ramprakash Rawat, Aged About 61 Years, Both resident Of Plot No. D-29-A, Northern Part Plot No.
30 Southern Part) D-Block, Model Town, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan State.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anurag Pareek
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by and on behalf of the petitioner-plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by condonation of delay in filing civil misc. appeal by the defendants against the final order dated 15.07.2025 passed ex-parte on the application for temporary injunction.
2. Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff, during course of arguments, admits that proceedings in the main suit against defendants were held ex-parte vide order dated 15.07.2025 and on the same day, application for temporary injunction was decided. In the main suit, order of ex-parte has been set aside
[2026:RJ-JP:32541] (2 of 2) [CW-11964/2026] and the defendants have been permitted to participate in the suit proceedings and in Civil Misc. Appeal, delay in filing appeal against the injunction order has been condoned vide order impugned.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after condonation of delay, appeal is yet to be considered on merits, hence, in order to contest the appeal on merits, petitioner does not want to press this petition.
4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as not pressed.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
6. A copy of this order be sent to the Appellate Court. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 20/RACHNA