Rajasthan High Court
CW/8625/2026 of RAMESH KHATRI S/O SHRI LILADHAR KHATRI Vs M/S SONAMEET FOOD PRODUCTS on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8625/2026 CNR: RJHC020429532026 | URN: CW / 19066U / 2026 1. Ramesh Khatri S/o Shri Liladhar Khatri, (Deceased During Trial, Represented Through Lr) 1/1. Vaibhav Khatri S/o Late Shri Ramesh Khatri, R/o 2 Kha 25 Jawahar Nagar,
[2026:RJ-JP:32682]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8625/2026
CNR: RJHC020429532026 | URN: CW / 19066U / 2026
1.
Ramesh Khatri S/o Shri Liladhar Khatri, (Deceased During Trial, Represented Through Lr)
1/1.
Vaibhav Khatri S/o Late Shri Ramesh Khatri, R/o 2 Kha 25
Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
M/s Sonameet Food Products, Registered Partnership Firm Through Partner Smt. Meena Kukkad, Head Office 841
Chirag New Delhi
2.
Smt. Meena Kukkad, W/o Captain Shri V.k. Kukkad
3.
Ms Sonal Kukkad, W/o Captain Shri V.k. Kukkad
4.
V.k. Kukkad, H.u.f. Through Karta V.k. Kukkad Parteners M/s Sonameet Food Product R/o D-7, Greater Kailash Enclave-Ii, New Delhi And Second Address F-17 , B
Malviya Nagar Industrial, Area , Malviya Nagar Jaipur And J-1997 (Lgf) Cr Park, New Delhi 110019
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vipul Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. Petitioner filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions for early disposal of Eviction Petition No.40/2019, titled Ramesh Khatri v. M/s. Sonampreeet Food & Ors., pending before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan II, Jaipur.
2. Counsel for petitioner states that during pendency of the present writ petition, the eviction petition itself has been decided. Therefore, no direction for early disposal of the petition is required to be passed, and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
[2026:RJ-JP:32682] (2 of 2) [CW-8625/2026]
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
4. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 93