Rajasthan High Court
CCP/612/2026 of CHANDAN KUMAR CHATURVEDI S/O SHRI JAGDISH CHAND CHATURVEDI Vs SHRI SITARAM JAT, on 17 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 612/2026 CNR: RJHC020345372026 | URN: CCP / 648U / 2026 Chandan Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Shri Jagdish Chand Chaturvedi, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Julania Mohalla Bakani, District Jhalawar-326022(Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1.
[2026:RJ-JP:32671]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 612/2026
CNR: RJHC020345372026 | URN: CCP / 648U / 2026
Chandan Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Shri Jagdish Chand Chaturvedi, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Julania Mohalla Bakani, District Jhalawar-326022(Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Sitaram Jat, Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2.
Shri Bhim Singh Jat, The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary, District Jhalawar.
3.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Juhi Chaturvedi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG assisted by
Mr. Vishal Kumar &
Mr. Divyansh Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 04.02.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.02.2026, the respondents were directed to consider the representation of the petitioner for review of the suspension order.
2. Mr. Manoj Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that the due consideration on the representation of the petitioner has been made by the
[2026:RJ-JP:32671] (2 of 2) [CCP-612/2026] authorities and the same has been decided vide order dated 20.05.2026, which is placed on record as annexure R/1.
3. In view of the decision on the representation of the petitioner and in opinion of this Court, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order of the Court. Hence the contempt petition is disposed of.
4. Contempt notices are discharged.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J RAHUL MIRKHANI/67