Rajasthan High Court
ARBAP/26/2025 of KISHORE KUMAR ROGHA S/O SH. JETHA NAND ROGHA Vs DASHRATH KUMAR SAINI S/O SH. RADHEY SHYAM on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No.26/2025 CNR: RJHC020154492025 | URN: ARBAP / 42U / 2025 Kishore Kumar Rogha S/o Sh. Jetha Nand Rogha, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Rogha Compound, Anand Nagar Colony, Khairthal, Al- war (Rajasthan) ----Applicant Versus 1.
[2026:RJ-JP:32343]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Arbitration Application No.26/2025
CNR: RJHC020154492025 | URN: ARBAP / 42U / 2025
Kishore Kumar Rogha S/o Sh. Jetha Nand Rogha, Aged About 52
Years, R/o Rogha Compound, Anand Nagar Colony, Khairthal, Al- war (Rajasthan)
----Applicant
Versus
1.
Dashrath Kumar Saini S/o Sh. Radhey Shyam, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Dhandhela, Patan, Sikar, Neem Ka Thana (Rajasthan)
2.
Shimbhu Dayal Saini S/o Radhey Shyam, Aged About 55
Years, R/o Dhandhela, Patan, Sikar, Neem Ka Thana (Ra- jasthan)
----Non Applicants
3.
Raghuveer Prasad S/o Sh. Mukhe Ram, Aged About 55
Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Moolchand Patwari Ka Mohalla, Patan, Sikar (Rajasthan)
----Performa Non Applicant
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr.Srijan Tiwari, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms.Anisha Yadav, Adv.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026
1. The present Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 1996”) has been filed seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties.
2. There is a dispute arisen between the parties, which is to be resolved in terms of Clause 13 of the Partnership Deed dated 11.11.2021, which reads as under:
[2026:RJ-JP:32343] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-26/2025] “13. In case of the any dispute arising between the partners regarding the term and conditions of the instrument as the firm's business the same shall be referred to arbitration and decision of the arbitration shall be binding on all partners proceeding of the arbitration shall be governed by the arbitration Act, for the time being in force."
3. This Court, taking into consideration the nature of dispute which could not be sorted out between the parties through mediation, deems it appropriate to appoint Mr.Atul Kumar Chatterjee, (Retired District Judge) Resident of C-500, Nirman Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.)-302019 to act as a Sole Arbitrator and to decide all issues without prejudice to the rights and contentions raised in the present arbitration proceedings.
4. The arbitration fees shall be determined in accordance with the 4th Schedule of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'Act of 1996') as amended. The fee of the Arbitrator will be equally borne by both the parties.
5. The Arbitration Application is allowed accordingly.
6. Copy of this order be sent to the appointed Sole Arbitrator. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA), ACTING CJ 28/Himanshu Soni