Rajasthan High Court
CCP/14/2026 of PRAHALAD SINGH SON OF SHRI BANAY SINGH Vs SMT. GAYATRI RATHORE, SECRETARY PUBLIC AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 14/2026 CNR: RJHC021145602025 | URN: CCP / 14U / 2026 1. Prahalad Singh Son Of Shri Banay Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o. 43, Vill. Banji, Post Bhont, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan- 321303 2. Jeetam Singh S/o. Shri Mahaveer
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 14/2026
CNR: RJHC021145602025 | URN: CCP / 14U / 2026
1.
Prahalad Singh Son Of Shri Banay Singh, Aged About 38
Years, R/o. 43, Vill. Banji, Post Bhont, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan- 321303
2.
Jeetam Singh S/o. Shri Mahaveer Singh, Aged About 52
Years, R/o. Brahman Thok Girara, Vpo Piprau, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) 321614
3.
Dhaniram S/o. Shri Hariram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o.
Naiyo Ka Thok, Vill Kheda, Khera, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj. )321642
4.
Balbeer S/o. Shri Prem Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o .vill. Manjhi, Post Bahramda, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)
321602.
5.
Bharat Singh S/o. Shri Govind Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o. Vpo Naroli, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)-321410
6.
Raman Lal S/o. Shri Khyali, Aged About 52 Years, R/o.
Village Sunhera, Tehsil Kaman, Distt Bharatpur (Raj.)321022
7.
Man Singh Son Of Shri Bucha Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o. Village Kekra, Beham, Tehsil Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) 321203
8.
Prakash Chand Sharma S/o. Shri Sohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o. Village Nagla Khoh, Post Khoh, Tehsil Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) - 321203
9.
Gopal Singh Son Of Shri Yad Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o. 36, Thakur Mohalla, Nogaya, Peepla, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) 321021
10.
Jagan S/o. Shri Ram Kishan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o.
Vpo Nagla Dandoo, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)
321023
11.
Bharat Singh S/o. Shri Ghanshyam, Aged About 49 Years, R/o. Jahangirpur, Vpo Gobra, Via Bayana, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) -321028
12.
Vijay Singh Son Of Shri Dharm Singh, Aged About 52
Years, R/o. Vill. Jiroli, Post Bhadarpur, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)-321021
(2 of 3)
[CCP-14/2026]
13.
Raju S/o. Shri Bigharam, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 290, Mohalla Jat, Vpo Nonera, Tehsil Kanma, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) 321023
14.
Ram Singh Badhel S/o. Shri Nathi Badhel, Aged About 47
Years, R/o. Netvadi, Natwadi, Vpo Bhandara, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) - 321022
15.
Inder Singh Son Of Shri Sultan Singh, Aged About 59
Years, R/o. Village Post Hantra, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj.)321028
16.
Sauveer Singh S/o. Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Honta, Post Khedli Gadsiya, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) 321028
17.
Umar Mohammad S/o. Shri Resham Khan, Aged About 59
Years, R/o. Bamni, Tehsil Kaman, Distt. Deeg, Rajasthan.
18.
Dharmendra Singh S/o. Basudev, Aged About 49 Years, R/o. Kherli Gadasiya, Tehsil Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Secretary Public And Health Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Dr. Joga Ram, Secretary, Panchyati Raj And Rural Development Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Mr. Narendra Kumar Verma, The Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Krishana Nagar, Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur.
4.
Ishu Kumar Narang, The Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Deeg, Distt. Deeg, Rajasthan
5.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Public And Health Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Dhawan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC, for PHED
Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore
(3 of 3)
[CCP-14/2026]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in compliance of the order of the Court, the respondents have decided the representation. In view of the statements made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notice/s stand/s discharged. The petitioners would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to them under law to challenge the order passed on the representation if they feel aggrieved by the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/89