Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/3476/2016 of RAJU SINGH AND ORS Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3476/2016 CNR: RJHC020062402016 | URN: CRLMP / 5536U / 2016 1. Raju Singh son Late Shri Kishore Singh, 2. Smt. Gulab Kanwar W/o Late Kishore Singh 3.Gajju Singh S/o Late Kishore Singh 4. Smt. Saroj Kanwar W/o
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3476/2016
CNR: RJHC020062402016 | URN: CRLMP / 5536U / 2016
1. Raju Singh son Late Shri Kishore Singh,
2. Smt. Gulab Kanwar W/o Late Kishore Singh
3.Gajju Singh S/o Late Kishore Singh
4. Smt. Saroj Kanwar W/o Gajju Singh
All R/o Plot No. 65, Basant Vihar Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar Jaipur
5. Smt. Ram Kanwar W/o Prithvi Singh
6. Prithvi Singh S/o Samundra Singh
7. Smt. Santosh Kanwar W/o Narendra Singh All R/o Plot No. 110, Basant Vihar Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
---Respondent
2. Smt. Chain Kanwar D/o Shri Bhawani Singh, R/o Plot No. 147- B, Mahadev Colony, Opp. Alfa International School, Alankar College Road, Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar, Jaipur
----Respondent-complainant
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3465/2016
CNR: RJHC020545502016 | URN: CRLMP / 5525U / 2016
1. Raju Singh son Late Shri Kishore Singh,
2. Smt. Gulab Kanwar W/o Late Kishore Singh
3. Gajju Singh S/o Late Kishore Singh
4. Smt. Saroj Kanwar W/o Gajju Singh
All R/o Plot No. 65, Basant Vihar Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar Jaipur
5. Nandu Kanwar W/o Jai Singh
6. Jai Singh S/o Samunder Singh
All R/o Plot No. 110, Basant Vihar Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
...Respondent
(2 of 4)
[CRLMP-3476/2016]
2. Smt. Chain Kanwar D/o Shri Bhawani Singh, R/o Plot No. 147- B, Mahadev Colony, Opp. Alfa International School, Alankar College Road, Panchyawala, P.S. Karni Vihar, Jaipur
----Complainant/Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sudhir Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP &
Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3476/2016:-
1. An application number 23570/2017 is filed for deciding the matter on the basis of compromise between the parties.
2. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition is filed for quashing FIR No. 209/2026 dated 04.07.216 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur (West) for the offense under Sections 406, 420, 376 & 120B of IPC by the petitioners-accused.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report received from Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur (West). The report is taken on record.
4. The report clearly indicate that the complainant has registered current FIR and FIR No.306/2016 against the petitioners-accused at PS Mahila Thana and PS Karni Vihar, Jaipur (West) respectively, and the complainant has filed an application along with affidavit and compromise dated 24th March 2017 to police to close the matter. The police, after considering the compromise and investigation, has found that no case has been made out against the petitioners-accused and proposed a closure
(3 of 4) [CRLMP-3476/2016] report (F.R.) registered on the basis of false facts and drawn FR No. 87/2022 dated 29.08.2022.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor undertake that the FR if not filed before the trial court, be filed within a period of two weeks from now.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners offers to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition in light of report with liberty to take appropriate steps in case any proceeding out of said FIR is initiated against the petitioners at the behest of the complainant.
7. Misc. petition along with pending application, if any, disposed as withdrawn. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3465/2016:-
1. The instant criminal misc. petition is filed by the petitioners- accused for quashing FIR No.306/2016 dated 12th July 2016 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (West) for the offence under Sections 354, 376, 511, 384 and 323 IPC.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report received from Assistant Police Commissioner, Vishali Nagar, Jaipur (West). The report indicates that there is a dispute between the parties about House No. 147-B Mahadev Nagar and due to the dispute, a false report has been registered by the complainant. The police has found that no case has been made out and the incident has never taken place. The police could not conclude the investigation as there is a stay by this Court vide order dated 12th August 2016. The report is taken on record.
3. In a report filed in connected matter, the complainant has filed an application along with affidavit and compromise dated 24th March 2017 to close the proceedings. The material indicate
(4 of 4) [CRLMP-3476/2016] that there were four FIRs registered in relation to these parties and details have been mentioned in the report submitted by Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur (West).
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the police has proposed a closure report in form of FR and as soon as the stay is vacated, the police will propose FR and will file before the trial Court.
5. In view of statement of learned Public Prosecutor, learned counsel for the petitioners offers to withdraw the instant miscellaneous petition with liberty to take appropriate steps in case any action is initiated pursuant to said FIR by complainant.
6. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. The police is directed to file FR within a period of four weeks from now.
7. Stay application stands dismissed in both the matters. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 16-17/MR