Rajasthan High Court

CCP/922/2025 of SMT. MOHINI SHARMA W/O (LATE) SHRI PRAKASH SHARMA Vs MRS. MALINI AGARWAL, PRESENTLY DIRECTOR GENERAL (DG) on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 922/2025 CNR: RJHC020731412025 | URN: CCP / 985U / 2025 1. Smt. Mohini Sharma W/o (Late) Shri Prakash Sharma, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 109, Ganga Market, Shahpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Ritu Sharma D/o (Late) Shri Prakash

[2026:RJ-JP:32333]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 922/2025

CNR: RJHC020731412025 | URN: CCP / 985U / 2025

1.

Smt. Mohini Sharma W/o (Late) Shri Prakash Sharma, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 109, Ganga Market, Shahpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2.

Ritu Sharma D/o (Late) Shri Prakash Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o 109, Ganga Market, Shahpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

3.

Himanshu Sharma S/o (Late) Shri Prakash Sharma, Aged About 21 Years, R/o 109, Ganga Market, Shahpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

Mrs. Malini Agarwal, Presently Director General (Dg), Civil Protection And Chief Commandant, Home Guard, Rajasthan.

2.

Shri N.k. Mishra, Presently Financial Advisor, Home Guard, Headquarters, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

3.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Finance, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

None present

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Samee Khan for Mr. Bhuwnesh

Sharma, AAG

Mr. Yash Joshi & Ms. Tanvisha Pant for

Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

14/08/2026

1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of the order dated 01.04.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:32333] (2 of 2) [CCP-922/2025]

2. The writ petition is said to have been filed by the petitioners for grant of ex-gratia amount.

3. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has already been extended ex-gratia amount of Rs.19,25,000/- on 07.08.2026 and has placed before this Court the letter dated 13.08.2026 and so also the document relating to transfer of the amount in the account of the petitioner.

5. In view of the fact that ex-gratia amount has already been transferred in the account of the petitioner, in opinion of this Court that the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order of the Court.

6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed.

7. Contempt notices stand discharged.

8. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 125/Ashish Kumar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead