Rajasthan High Court

CRLMP/3234/2026 of RAM KUMAR MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI HEMARAM MEENA, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3234/2026 CNR: RJHC020480502026 | URN: CRLMP / 7303U / 2026 1. Ram Kumar Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, 2. Bhawani Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, 3.

[2026:RJ-JP:32322]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3234/2026

CNR: RJHC020480502026 | URN: CRLMP / 7303U / 2026

1.

Ram Kumar Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 38 Years,

2.

Bhawani Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 38 Years,

3.

Tulsiram Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 32 Years,

4.

Ramlal Meena Son Of Late Shri Hemaram Meena, Aged About 30 Years, All Resident Of Village Asarpura, Bhangarpura, Naryan Vihar, Block- O, Phase-2, Mansarovar, Jaipur.

----Accused-Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

Respondent

2.

Prabhat Kant Sharma Son Of Durga Prasad Sharma, R/o 20, Mohit Vihar Chopra Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan.

----Complainant/Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dinesh Yadav, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

14/08/2026

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since all the alleged offences are bailable in nature, he may be allowed to file appropriate representation before the concerned Investigating Officer along with supportive documents.

2. Prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners seems to be just and reasonable.

[2026:RJ-JP:32322] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3234/2026]

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that if any representation is filed by the petitioner before the Investigating Officer, same shall be taken into consideration before forming any opinion.

4. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners shall be at liberty to file an appropriate representation along with the relevant documents before the Investigating Officer within a period of 10 days from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioners, the Investigating Officer shall duly consider the same before forming any opinion in the matter, provided that the investigation has not been concluded till date.

5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 46/MADAN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead