Rajasthan High Court
CW/5395/2025 of KAMLESH KUMAR VASHISTHA S/O LATE SUVALAL Vs HANSRAJ TANWAR on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5395/2025 CNR: RJHC020305332025 | URN: CW / 12919U / 2025 Kamlesh Kumar Vashistha S/o Late Suvalal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Hansraj Tanwar, Late
[2026:RJ-JP:32296]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5395/2025
CNR: RJHC020305332025 | URN: CW / 12919U / 2025
Kamlesh Kumar Vashistha S/o Late Suvalal, Aged About 48
Years, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Hansraj Tanwar, Late Phoolchand
2.
Mali Devi, W/o Late Phoolchand
3.
Smt. Ratan Devi W/o Hansraj, Respondents No. 1 To 3, Resident of Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
4.
Suvalal Vashistha, (Since Died During Trial)
4/1.
Narendra Kumar, S/o Late Suvalal
4/2.
Jagdish Prasad, S/o Late Suvalal
4/3.
Brijesh, S/o Late Suvalal
4/4.
Sajjan Devi, W/o Late Suvalal
4/5.
Gayatri Devi, D/o Late Suvalal
4/6.
Sushila Devi, D/o Late Suvalal
4/7.
Santosh Devi, D/o Late Suvalal
4/8.
Vimlesh W/o Late Omprakash, S/o Late Suvalal 4/9.
Swati D/o Late Omprakash, S/o Late Suvalal 4/10.
Aditya S/o Late Omprakash, Late Suvalal
4/11.
Lalita Devi W/o Late Dharmendra, S/o Late Suvalal 4/12.
5.
Priyanshi D/o Late Dharmendra S/o Late Suvalal, Since Minor, Through Natural Guardian Mother Lalita Devi.
Respondents No. 4/1 To 4/12, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
Sriram Vashistha S/o Late Suvalal, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
None Present
For Respondent(s)
:
None Present
[2026:RJ-JP:32296]
(2 of 2)
[CW-5395/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026
1. Despite granting an opportunity to file fresh notices of unserved respondents to petitioner vide order dated 22.07.2026, requisite PF and notices have not been filed.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner.
3. It appears that petitioner does not want to pursue this writ petition.
4. In such view, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for want of prosecution.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 24/NITIN