Rajasthan High Court
CCP/641/2023 of JAIPAL PUNJABI S/O SHRI ARJUN DAS Vs NATHMAL DIDEL, on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 641/2023 CNR: RJHC020432202023 | URN: CCP / 666U / 2023 Jaipal Punjabi S/o Shri Arjun Das, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B35, Prem Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Nathmal Didel, M.d. Rsrtc Head
[2026:RJ-JP:32507]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 641/2023
CNR: RJHC020432202023 | URN: CCP / 666U / 2023
Jaipal Punjabi S/o Shri Arjun Das, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B35, Prem Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Nathmal Didel, M.d. Rsrtc Head Quater Pariahan Marg Choumu House Jaipur.
2.
Ramgopal Pareek Finance Adviser, R.s.r.t.c Head Quater Parivahan Marg, Choumu House Jaipur.
3.
Bhanwar Ali Chief Manager, R.s.r.t.c Cental Bus Stand Sindhi Camp Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Krishan Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rajpal Dhankar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in compliance of the Court’s order, they are handing over a cheque bearing No.256600 dated 22.05.2026 amounting Rs.2,16,877/- to the petitioner who is present in Court. He further submits that now the order of the Court has been complied with by the respondents by handing over the aforesaid cheque amounting Rs.2,16,877/-. The petitioner who is present before this Court accepts the above referred cheque. Taking into consideration the fact that the respondents handed over the cheque to the petitioner for the dues as directed
[2026:RJ-JP:32507] (2 of 2) [CCP-641/2023] by the Court, in opinion of this Court that the respondents have complied with the order of the Court. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. If the petitioner still feels that some of the dues is still to be paid by the respondents, he may avail appropriate remedy available to him under law. Contempt notices stand discharged. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 120/Ashish Kumar