Rajasthan High Court
CCP/983/2025 of RAJESH KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI MANGI LAL SAINI Vs SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE, on 14 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 983/2025 CNR: RJHC020770882025 | URN: CCP / 1048U / 2025 Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Mangi Lal Saini, Aged About 33 Years, Village Badial Road, Saini Dharam Kanta Ke Pass, Panchmuki, Panditpura, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa
[2026:RJ-JP:32328]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 983/2025
CNR: RJHC020770882025 | URN: CCP / 1048U / 2025
Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Mangi Lal Saini, Aged About 33
Years, Village Badial Road, Saini Dharam Kanta Ke Pass, Panchmuki, Panditpura, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Dept. Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.
Dr. S.s. Agrawal, Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw) Jhlana Doongi Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipurp302004(Rajasthan).
3.
Dr. Seeta Ram Meena, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dausa Distt. Dausa (Raj.).
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Palak Rohila
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Yash Joshi,
Ms. Tanisha Panth, for
Mr. Vigyan Shah
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
14/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 01.07.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13493/2023.
2. By the order dated 01.07.2025, the respondents were directed to allow the joining of the petitioner on the post in
[2026:RJ-JP:32328] (2 of 2) [CCP-983/2025] question pursuant to his appointment which shall remain subject to final outcome of the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has been allowed joining on the post of Pharmacist and the petitioner has joined on 22.12.2025.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also fairly admits this fact that the petitioner has joined on the post of Pharmacist.
5. In view of the above, the Court finds that the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order.
6. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 146/SHRUTI SHARMA