Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/11818/2026 of ROHIT @ VIKKI S/O GOVIND SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11818/2026 CNR: RJHC020709532026 | URN: CRLMB / 21770U / 2026 Rohit @ Vikki S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Peeraka, Police Station Jaluki District Deeg (At Present Confined In District

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11818/2026

CNR: RJHC020709532026 | URN: CRLMB / 21770U / 2026

Rohit @ Vikki S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Peeraka, Police Station Jaluki District Deeg (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg Rajasthan).

----Accused-Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP with

Ms. Neha Goyal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

13/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 10.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional District & Session Judge, Brijnagar, District- Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.393/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.13/2026, Police Station Jaluki, District-Deeg for the offence under Section 304(2) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused Dharamveer has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court. He further submits that there are five cases reported to be pending against the petitioner. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2026.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11818/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan has already been filed and even the offences are triable by Magistrate. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and accordingly prays that he may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the challan has been filed; offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; there are five cases reported to be pending against the petitioner; co-accused Dharamveer has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Rohit @ Vikki S/o Govind Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.13/2026, Police Station Jaluki, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11818/2026] and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the concerned Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by concerned Officer.

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the concerned Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 147/MAHIMA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead