Rajasthan High Court

CW/14181/2026 of INDU JONWAL W/O SHRI NARAIN JONWAL Vs NARENDRA KUMAR GUPTA S/O LATE SATYANARAYAN GUPTA on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14181/2026 CNR: RJHC020715672026 | URN: CW / 30692U / 2026 Indu Jonwal W/o Shri Narain Jonwal, Residing At Plot No. 660, Sanjay Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus Narendra Kumar Gupta S/o Late

[2026:RJ-JP:32017]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14181/2026

CNR: RJHC020715672026 | URN: CW / 30692U / 2026

Indu Jonwal W/o Shri Narain Jonwal, Residing At Plot No. 660, Sanjay Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan

----Petitioner

Versus

Narendra Kumar Gupta S/o Late Satyanarayan Gupta, Residing At Plot No. 662, Sanjay Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Pranav Sharma

Mr. Mahendra Kumar Saran

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13/08/2026

1. Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against an ad interim injunction passed by the Additional Civil Judge No.3, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, vide order dated 15.07.2026 in the application for temporary injunction bearing No.217/2026. The ad interim injunction order has been granted by the trial Court in exercise of its powers under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC although, the application for temporary injunction is yet to be decided finally, hence thereagainst, petitioner may avail the remedy of appeal before the District Judge under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC.

2. In view of above, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal against the order impugned before the District Judge.

[2026:RJ-JP:32017] (2 of 2) [CW-14181/2026]

3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

4. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 13/RONAK JAIMAN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead