Rajasthan High Court

CCP/403/2026 of PRIYANKA D/O SUBE SINGH, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 403/2026 CNR: RJHC020220132026 | URN: CCP / 426U / 2026 Priyanka D/o Sube Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Thothi, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 403/2026

CNR: RJHC020220132026 | URN: CCP / 426U / 2026

Priyanka D/o Sube Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Thothi, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3.

Shyam Sundar Agrawal, The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.).

4.

Rakesh Kumar Sharma, The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Sudhir Yadav

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Yash Joshi

Ms. Tanvisha Pant

Mr. Deepak Mittal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13/08/2026

1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 13.11.2025 passed in S.B. CWP No. 18958/2024.

2. By the order dated 13.11.2025, the respondents were directed to consider the decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the same in light of the order passed in the case of Aman Kumari Vs. State of

(2 of 3) [CCP-403/2026] Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. CWP No. 7512/2022 decided on 21.09.2022.

3. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 13.11.2025, the petitioner submitted representation to the respondents on 01.12.2025.

4. As per the directions of the Court, the respondents were supposed to decide the representation of the petitioner within 30 days from the receipt of the same meaning thereby they were to decide the representation by 31.12.2025.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents Mr. Yash Joshi states that in compliance of the directions of the Court, the respondents have decided the representation of the petitioner by order dated 12.08.2026. He further submits that infact there is delay in deciding the representation, however the respondents tender their unconditional apology for the delay which occurred in deciding the representation.

6. As per the order dated 12.08.2026, the respondents have decided to include the name of the petitioner for selection to the post of Nursing Officer under the EWS Women category as she has secured more than the cut-off marks declared for the EWS Women category.

7. Since the respondents have decided the representation in favour of the petitioner by declaring her selected for the post of Nursing officer under the EWS Women category, now the respondents are under obligation to issue appointment and posting order for the petitioner. The direction was to decide the representation of the petitioner and the respondents have decided the representation, in opinion of the Court, the respondents have

(3 of 3) [CCP-403/2026] complied with the order and as far as the delay in deciding the same is concerned, the unconditional apology tendered by the counsel for the respondents for delay in deciding the representation is accepted.

8. Accordingly this contempt petition is disposed of.

9. Contempt notice/s are discharged.

10. In view of the fact that the respondents have declared the petitioner selected for appointment and posting for the post of Nursing Officer under the EWS Women category, now the respondents shall issue the appointment and posting order to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from today.

11. In case the appointment and posting order is not issued within the given period of 7 days and the petitioner is not allowed joining, the petitioner may move an application for revival of this contempt petition. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/75

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead