Rajasthan High Court

CCP/309/2026 of BHAGYA SHREE SAINI D/O PARMANAND SAINI Vs VAIBHAV GALRIYA, on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 309/2026 CNR: RJHC020153862026 | URN: CCP / 326U / 2026 Bhagya Shree Saini D/o Parmanand Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o F 7A, Saraswati Nagar, Sector-6, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Rajastahn ----Petitioner Versus 1. Vaibhav

[2026:RJ-JP:32125]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 309/2026

CNR: RJHC020153862026 | URN: CCP / 326U / 2026

Bhagya Shree Saini D/o Parmanand Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o F 7A, Saraswati Nagar, Sector-6, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Rajastahn

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Vaibhav Galriya, Principal Secretary, Department Of Treasuries And Accounts, Government Of Rajasthan, Vitta Bhawan, Jan Path, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2.

Sandhya Sharma, Director, Treasury And Account, Government Of Rajasthan, Vitta Bhawan, Jan Path, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

3.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Ashok Nagar Jaipur (Rajasthan).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vageesh Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13/08/2026

1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 03.07.2025.

2. Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG appearing for the respondents states that the State has preferred D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 673/2026 to challenge the order dated 03.07.2025. She has placed before this Court the photocopy of the order dated 10.07.2026 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench, whereby the

[2026:RJ-JP:32125] (2 of 2) [CCP-309/2026] operation of the order passed by the learned Single Judge has been stayed.

3. In view of staying the effect and operation of the order dated 03.07.2025, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, the Court deems just and proper to dispose of this contempt petition at this stage.

4. Accordingly this contempt petition is disposed of.

5. The petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of this contempt petition after disposal of the D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 673/2026 or after revocation of the interim order dated 10.07.2026.

6. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed.

7. Contempt notice/s stand/s discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/155

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead