Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1001/2026 of SHITANSHU YADAV S/O SHRI BALJEET KUMAR, Vs SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE, on 12 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1001/2026 CNR: RJHC020527812026 | URN: CCP / 1050U / 2026 1. Shitanshu Yadav S/o Shri Baljeet Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Shikshak Colony, Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Ashok Yadav S/o Shri Mohan Lal, R/o Ward
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1001/2026
CNR: RJHC020527812026 | URN: CCP / 1050U / 2026
1.
Shitanshu Yadav S/o Shri Baljeet Kumar, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Shikshak Colony, Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2.
Ashok Yadav S/o Shri Mohan Lal, R/o Ward No. 11, Sawaipura, Kochore, Tehsil Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Dr. Ravi Prakash Sharma, Director, Department Of Department Of Medical And Health Services, Medical Health And Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Mark, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajasthan, Agriculture Management Institute Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Suresh Chaudhary, Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Jaipur (Now The Rajasthan State Allied And Healthcare Council)
Registered Address-C-7A, Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Hwy, Bani Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302016.
5.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Hitesh Bagri
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/08/2026
(2 of 3) [CCP-1001/2026]
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners for non-compliance of the order dated 28.01.2026.
2. Vide order dated 28.01.2026, the Court directed to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 14.10.2025 sent by the petitioners in light of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024).
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the material made available on record.
4. The petitioners have not enclosed the copy of the legal notice dated 14.10.2025 as regards which the directions were issued by the Court to the respondents to decide the same.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is also not able to show that what specific relief has been claimed by the petitioners by submitting the legal notice dated 14.10.2025 and which authority has to decide the legal notice of the petitioners.
6. For want of the specific relief, no direction can be issued to a particular authority to decide the legal notice for the reasons that the issue, as has been raised by the petitioners, is in connection with various authorities. As far as the Rajasthan Paramedical Council is concerned, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have made registration with it, but nothing has been decided by the authorities of the Rajasthan Paramedical Council.
7. As regards the consideration of the candidature of the petitioners to the post of Assistant Radiographer is concerned in pursuance of the advertisement dated 12.06.2020, the petitioners
(3 of 3) [CCP-1001/2026] were not registered with the Rajasthan Paramedical Council on the date of last cutoff date for submitting the application form, therefore, he could not consider as an eligible candidate for the recruitment and, therefore, nothing more is to be considered and decided by the Recruiting Agency, i.e. Medical Health Department.
8. Accordingly, this Court finds no merit in the contempt petition and same is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 20/ARTI SHARMA