Rajasthan High Court
CRES/214/2026 of PRADEEP KUMAR SON OF NAND RAM, Vs SATYAVATI DEVI WIFE OF ASHOK KUMAR, on 12 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 214/2026 In S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.191/2019 CNR: RJHC020392962026 | URN: CRES / 530U / 2026 1 Pradeep Kumar S/o Nand Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mugal Bardu, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani (Hariyana) 2 Rakesh
[2026:RJ-JP:31768]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 214/2026
In
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.191/2019
CNR: RJHC020392962026 | URN: CRES / 530U / 2026
Pradeep Kumar S/o Nand Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mugal Bardu, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani (Hariyana)
Rakesh Kumar S/o Mahipal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Manoharpura, Post Dhulwa, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
Satyavati Devi W/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Manoharpura, Tehsil Buhana, Post Dhulwa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) At Present R/o Near New Housing Board, Ward No. 11, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
Vijay Singh Katewa S/o Harsukhram, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Near Kanwarpura (Bakhtawarpura), Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dhanraj Bhaskar
Mr. Vijay Gaur
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/08/2026
1. The present restoration application has been filed for recalling of the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by this Court, as well as the consequential order dated 18.04.2026 passed by the Registrar (Judl.) in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.191/2019.
2. Heard and considered the facts of the case.
[2026:RJ-JP:31768] (2 of 2) [CRES-214/2026]
3. For the reasons stated in the restoration application, the same is allowed.
4. Accordingly, the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by this Court, as well as the consequential order dated 18.04.2026 passed by the Registrar (Judl.) in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.191/2019, are hereby recalled.
5. S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.191/2019 is restored to its original number. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Deepa-46