Rajasthan High Court

CW/14969/2026 of DHAPU Vs KAMLESH DEVI WIFE OF SHRI BADRILAL on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14969/2026 CNR: RJHC020746722026 | URN: CW / 31911U / 2026 1 Dhapu, Wife Of Gangaram 2 Gajanand, Son Of Gangaram 3 Gopal, Son Of Gangaram 4 Bholi Bai, Daughter Of Gangaram 5 Jitendra Alias Ramful, Son Of Gangaram 6 Kali Devi,

[2026:RJ-JP:31837]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14969/2026

CNR: RJHC020746722026 | URN: CW / 31911U / 2026

Dhapu, Wife Of Gangaram

Gajanand, Son Of Gangaram

Gopal, Son Of Gangaram

Bholi Bai, Daughter Of Gangaram

Jitendra Alias Ramful, Son Of Gangaram

Kali Devi, Wife Of Ramkaran

Mahadev, Son Of Ramkaran

Jaisingh, Son Of Ramkaran

Mahavir, Son Of Ramkaran

Kanta, Daughter Of Ramkaran

Sumitra, Daughter Of Ramkaran

Meena, Daughter Of Ramkaran

Kamlesh, Son Of Gokal

Koshalya, Daughter Of Gokal

Lad Devi, Wife Of Rajesh

Vikram, Son Of Rajesh

Nisha, Daughter Of Rajesh

Hazari, Son Of Goru

Nandu, Wife Of Mangilal

Tarachand, Son Of Mangilal

Sohan, Son Of Sakram

Shivraj, Son Of Sakrag

Prem Devi Daughter Of Sakram, Residents Of Village Unkarpura Tehsil Savaran District Ajmer Rajasthan

----Petitioners

Versus

Kamlesh Devi Wife Of Shri Badrilal, Age Adult Resident Of Ajmer Road Indrapura Colony, Devli Village, Tehsil Devli, District Tonk.

Ambalal Son Of Shri Ramdev, Age Adult Resident Of Bisanpura, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Raj.

[2026:RJ-JP:31837]

(2 of 2)

[CW-14969/2026]

Balu Son Of Shri Ramdev, Age Adult Resident Of Bisanpura, Gudha Nathawat, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Raj.

Bali Daughter Of Ramdev, Wife Of Pannalal, Resident Of Bisanpura, Currently Resident Of Pakalpuria, Aamli, District Bundi

Shankarlal Son Of Shri Ramdev, Age Adult Resident Of Bisanpura, Gudha Nathawat, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi, Raj.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

12/08/2026 In the light of the order dated 12.08.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15426/2026, counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Pcg-C/1

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead