Rajasthan High Court
CW/15017/2026 of KAILASH CHAND S/O LATE SHRI HUKAMCHAND Vs DESHRAJ CHOUHAN, S/O SHRI GANESH NARAYAN CHOUHAN on 12 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15017/2026 CNR: RJHC020685672026 | URN: CW / 31992U / 2026 Kailash Chand S/o Late Shri Hukamchand, Aged About 48 Years, (Mother-Smt. Mohini Devi), R/o Plot No. 119/101, Agarwal Farm, Sector-11, Mansarovar, Ward No. 26, Tehsil
[2026:RJ-JP:31807]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15017/2026
CNR: RJHC020685672026 | URN: CW / 31992U / 2026
Kailash Chand S/o Late Shri Hukamchand, Aged About 48 Years, (Mother-Smt. Mohini Devi), R/o Plot No. 119/101, Agarwal Farm, Sector-11, Mansarovar, Ward No. 26, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 302020
----Petitioner
Versus
Deshraj Chouhan, S/o Shri Ganesh Narayan Chouhan, R/o House No. 7 D 19, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ramit Pareek
Ms. Ujala Pareek
Mr. Kartik Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/08/2026
1. Instant civil writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, feeling aggrieved by order dated 10.07.2026 passed in Original Application No.168/2026 by the Rent Tribunal No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-I whereby interim prayer for protection of possession made by petitioner, has been dismissed.
2. Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is in possession over the rented premise comprising one Room, Chowk, Kitchen and Latbath situated at Plot No.119/101, Agarwal Farm, Sector- 11, Mansarovar, Jaipur since 14.07.2000 under the oral tenancy and paying regular rent at the rate of Rs.3000 per month apart
[2026:RJ-JP:31807] (2 of 2) [CW-15017/2026] from making payment of the electricity and water consumption charges, yet respondent wants to dispossess the petitioner by force and without following due process of law.
3. Counsel for petitioner, during course of arguments, prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file appeal against the order impugned before the Appellate Rent Tribunal.
4. In view of above, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal against the order impugned before the Appellate Rent Tribunal.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 22/NITIN