Rajasthan High Court
SAW/888/2026 of KALPANA NUNIA D/O LATE SHAHEED RAMNIWAS NUNIA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 11 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 888/2026 CNR: RJHC020765312026 | URN: SAW / 1793U / 2026 Kalpana Nunia D/o Late Shaheed Ramniwas Nunia, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Forester (Employee Id Rjjj202323024620), Chirawa Range, District Jhunjhunu,
[2026:RJ-JP:31513-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 888/2026
CNR: RJHC020765312026 | URN: SAW / 1793U / 2026
Kalpana Nunia D/o Late Shaheed Ramniwas Nunia, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Forester (Employee Id Rjjj202323024620), Chirawa Range, District Jhunjhunu, Resident Of Plot No. 26, Surya Vihar, Astha Colony, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
----Appellant
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Forest, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests And Head Of Forest Force (Hoff), Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
Deputy Conservator Of Forests, Jhunjhunu.
4.
Regional/range Forest Officer, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Akhil Simlote
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
11/08/2026
1. The appeal challenges the order dated 31.07.2026 whereby the writ petitioner-appellant was transferred from Chirawa to Jhunjhunu. The transfer order dated 10.07.2026 challenged by the appellant, posts her from Chirawa to Malsisar Nursery Jhunjunu. She holds a post of Forester and the posting orders are in the same district.
[2026:RJ-JP:31513-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-888/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the transfer has affected her day to day life, she is a single women.
3. We find that the posting/transfers are within the same district.
4. Learned Single Judge has also noted that the transfer is only 43 KM away and has, therefore, not interfered, we too do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge.
5. The appeal is dismissed accordingly.
6. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ 7/RIYA