Rajasthan High Court
CCP/40/2026 of YATENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, S/O SHRI RAM NARAIN SHARMA, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 11 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 40/2026 CNR: RJHC020036672026 | URN: CCP / 49U / 2026 IN S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.3614/2002 Yatendra Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Ram Narain Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 42, New Colony Bundi, District Bundi.
[2026:RJ-JP:31607]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 40/2026
CNR: RJHC020036672026 | URN: CCP / 49U / 2026
IN
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.3614/2002
Yatendra Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Ram Narain Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 42, New Colony Bundi, District Bundi.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur-302005 (Rajasthan).
2.
Shri. Dharmendra Kumar Meena, Ayukt, Nagar Parishad, Near K.n. Singh Circle, Bundi-323001 (Rajasthan).
3.
Shri Ravi Jain, Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur-302005(Rajasthan).
4.
Shri Juikar Pratik Chandrashekhar, Director Department Of Local Self, Government, G-3, Rajmahal Residencial Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-302016
(Rajasthan).
5.
Smt. Saroj Agarwal, Chairman, Municipal Board, Near K.n. Singh Circle Bundi-323001 (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rachit Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Surya Pratap Singh for
Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
11/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non compliance of the order dated 09.10.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3614/2002.
[2026:RJ-JP:31607] (2 of 2) [CCP-40/2026]
2. The Court vide order dated 09.10.2024 directed to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically, as regards the allotment of land/shop.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents has placed before this Court the copy of the letter dated 05.05.2026, issued to the petitioner, whereby it has been observed that the petitioner’s case is not found to be eligible for allotment of land/shop.
4. Copy of the letter dated 05.05.2026 is taken on record.
5. In view of the consideration of the petitioner’s case and issuance of the letter dated 05.05.2026, in opinion of this Court, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order.
6. Hence, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
7. Contempt notices stand discharged.
8. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him under law, so as to challenge the letter dated 05.05.2026, in case he feels aggrieved of the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 117/ARTI SHARMA