Rajasthan High Court
CW/19034/2024 of MANGELAL S/O SHRI GANESH Vs KALURAM S/O SHRI NONDARAM on 11 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19034/2024 CNR: RJHC021051792024 | URN: CW / 39937U / 2024 Mangelal S/o Shri Ganesh, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Station Road Rajgarh Karoth, Tehseel Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1 Kaluram S/o Shri
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19034/2024
CNR: RJHC021051792024 | URN: CW / 39937U / 2024
Mangelal S/o Shri Ganesh, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Station Road Rajgarh Karoth, Tehseel Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
Kaluram S/o Shri Nondaram, Since Deceased Through Legal Heir- 1.1
Smt. Lali Devi, Aged About 60 Years, W/o Kalu Ram 1.2
Bhag Chand Saini, Aged About 35 Years, S/o Shree Kalu Ram 1.3
Santra, Aged About 16 Years, D/o Kalu Ram 1.4
Pinki, Aged About 23 Years, D/o Kalu Ram 1.5
Anita D/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 20 Years, (The Minor Through Mother Smt. Lali Devi, All Resident Of Mataji Ka Nala Tan Katoth, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar)
Smt. Revri W/o Shri Pooran, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Laxminarain S/o Shri Pooran, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Girraj S/o Shri Pooran, Aged About 15 Years, Through Mother Mst. Revri, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Smt. Sunita D/o Shri Pooran, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Smt. Bholi D/o Shri Pooran, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Mst. Shyani W/o Kalyan Sahai (D/o Nonda Ram), Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Mst. Rupa W/o Bhagwan Sahai (D/o Nonda Ram), Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Mst. Prem D/o Revad Ram, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Dalchand S/o Rewadram, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Mst. Puni Devi D/o Revadram, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar
Reliance Communication, Through Manager Reliance Communication, Opposite Rajmahal Palace Hotel, Near Mister Deen Restaurant, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
Omprakash S/o Ganesh (Deceased), Aged About 50
Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
13.1
Hemlata W/o Omprakash, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
[2026:RJ-JP:31602]
(2 of 3)
[CW-19034/2024]
13.2
Sumeet S/o Omprakash, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
13.3
Himanshu S/o Omprakash, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
13.4
Priya S/o Omprakash, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Surjan Widow Ganesh, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Radheshyam S/o Ganesh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Munni W/o Polya Ram, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Bhagwan S/o Polya, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Bhola S/o Polya, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Pappi D/o Polya, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Beena D/o Polya, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Station Road, Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
Tehsildar, Rajgarh, District Alwar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
11/08/2026
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner-defendant, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 13.11.2024 passed in Civil Suit No.34/34/2024 by the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Alwar, whereby the application filed by petitioner- defendant under Sections 11 and 151 CPC was dismissed.
2. Counsel appearing for respondents-plaintiffs submits that during pendency of present writ petition, the civil suit itself has been withdrawn, which has been permitted by the trial Court vide
(3 of 3) [CW-19034/2024] order dated 06.02.2026. A certified copy of the order dated 06.02.2026 has been placed on record.
3. In view of the withdrawal of the civil suit by respondents- plaintiffs, the challenge to the impugned order has rendered infructuous. Therefore, counsel for petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn and stands disposed of.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 27