Rajasthan High Court
CCP/792/2024 of SMT. CHANDA DEVI W/O SHRI OM PRAKASH NEHRA, Vs SHRI SUDHANSHU PANTH on 10 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 792/2024 CNR: RJHC020715082024 | URN: CCP / 858U / 2024 Smt. Chanda Devi W/o Shri Om Prakash Nehra, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village And Post Katrathal, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan, Presently Working On The
[2026:RJ-JP:31253]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 792/2024
CNR: RJHC020715082024 | URN: CCP / 858U / 2024
Smt. Chanda Devi W/o Shri Om Prakash Nehra, Aged About 54
Years, R/o Village And Post Katrathal, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan, Presently Working On The Post Of Pti Grade Ii Saheed Poornmal, Adarsh Senior Secondary School, Sanvlodha, Dhaiylan Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Sudhanshu Panth, Chief Secretary, State Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Krishan Kunal, Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Aashish Modi, Director Of Secondary Education, Department Of Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4.
Smt. Anusuyia Singh, Joint Director, School Education, Churu, (Division Churu), District Churu.
5.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dharmendra Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, assisted by
Mr. Vishal Kumar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have made compliance of the orders of the Court. In view of the statements made by counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is disposed off.
[2026:RJ-JP:31253] (2 of 2) [CCP-792/2024] Contempt notices are discharged. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/54