Rajasthan High Court
CR/122/2026 of GAURAV MEENA S/O SHRI ASHOK KR. Vs RAMLAL MEENA S/O SHRI BHAGWAN SAHAY MEENA on 10 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 122/2026 CNR: RJHC020251162026 | URN: CR / 218U / 2026 Gaurav Meena S/o Shri Ashok Kr., Aged About 38 Years, R/o Meena Dharmshala Near Naresh Tent House, Naya Bas, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ramlal Meena S/o
[2026:RJ-JP:31406]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 122/2026
CNR: RJHC020251162026 | URN: CR / 218U / 2026
Gaurav Meena S/o Shri Ashok Kr., Aged About 38 Years, R/o Meena Dharmshala Near Naresh Tent House, Naya Bas, Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Ramlal Meena S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena, R/o Plot No. 140, South West Block, Alwar, Tehsil Alwar Distt.
Alwar (Raj.)
2.
Smt. Jai Bai D/o Harbux W/o Ram Kishore Meena, aged about 67 years, at present resident of new plot No. 10, Rajaji Ka Bas, Behind Hanuman Mandir, Lal Diggi, Alwar Tehsil And District Alwar Raj.
3.
Khiladi Meena S/o Ram Kishore Meena, Aged About 32
Years, Resident of Plot No. 10, Rajaji Ka Bas, Behind Hanuman Mandir, Lal Diggi, Alwar Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj.).
4.
Smt. Phoolbai D/o Harbux W/o Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 67 Years, Resident of A-322, Shriram Colony, Alwar (Raj.).
5.
Satyanarayan Meena S/o Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, At Present Resident Of A-322, Shriram Colony, Alwar (Raj.).
6.
Rajendra Meena S/o Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 27
Years, At Present Resident Of A-322 Shrirram Colony, Alwar (Raj.).
7.
Sunita Alias Sanju Meena D/o Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, At Present Resident Of A-322 Shriram Colony, Alwar (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mahesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
[2026:RJ-JP:31406]
(2 of 2)
[CR-122/2026]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is amenable to an execution first appeal under Order 21 Rule 103 CPC, but due to bona fide error present civil revision petition has been filed, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to file an execution first appeal under Order 21 Rule 103 of CPC.
2. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
3. It is also made clear that in case the execution first appeal is filed, the appellant is at liberty to file an application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act seeking exclusion of time bonafidely pursuing the present civil revision petition, for the period commencing from date of filing of the revision petition i.e. 13.03.2026 till 10.08.2026.
4. A certified copy of the impugned order and Vakalatnama may be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining a xerox copy thereof.
5. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV/94