Rajasthan High Court
CFA/777/2026 of ATMARAM SON OF NANDKISHOR, Vs HARIMOHAN SON OF PRAHLAD, on 10 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 777/2026 CNR: RJHC020446842026 | URN: CFA / 1208U / 2026 Atmaram Son Of Nandkishor, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Jadawata, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). ----Appellant Versus Harimohan Son Of Prahlad, Aged About
[2026:RJ-JP:31374]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 777/2026
CNR: RJHC020446842026 | URN: CFA / 1208U / 2026
Atmaram Son Of Nandkishor, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Jadawata, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.).
----Appellant
Versus
Harimohan Son Of Prahlad, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Jadawata, Tehsil Sawai Madhopur, At Present Resident Of Meena Colony, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Karanpal Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the appellant, and upon instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present civil first appeal with liberty to assail the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 11.10.2022 by filing an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC before the learned Court below.
2. He further prays that the court fees so paid by the appellant may kindly be refunded back to the appellant.
3. Permission sought for is granted.
4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty sought for.
5. The appellant shall also be entitled for the refund of the Court fees of Rs.36,405/- in terms of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of High Court of Judicature at [2026:RJ-JP:31374] (2 of 2) [CFA-777/2026] Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.1, therefore, the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the Court fees of Rs.36,405/- in favour of the appellant.
6. The Stay Application No.2421/2026, CMCC No.1560/2026 as well as other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J 54/Seema 1 (2021) 3 SCC 560