CRLMB/4456/2026 of KAUSHAL SHARMA S/O DHANRAJ SHRINGI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 August 2026

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Aarti Mokhede D/o Late Shri Ganesh Prasad Mokhede, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Prasiya Road, Near Sai Mandir, Lonia Karbal Bhayde Colony, Chhindwada, Madhya Pradesh. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3928/2026 CNR: RJHC020233982026 | URN: CRLMB / 7002U / 2026 Anupam Choudhary S/o Mohan Choudhary, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Meethanpura, Sherpur Mujaffarpur, Police Station Meethanpura, District Mujaffarpur, Bihara, Presently R/o A 1/40, First Floor, Sector 14, Rohini Narela North West Delhi- 110085, Presently R/o House No. R-7, Third Floor, Budh Vihar, Phase-1, Delhi, Police Station Vijay Vihar, District Rohini, Delhi. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Banwari Singh Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman Mr. Pallav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 10/08/2026

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-4456/2026]

1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 06.03.2026 and 24.02.2026 respectively, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, District-Kota, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application (CIS) Nos. 547/2026 and 496/2026, whereby the bail applications of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.154/2025, Police Station-GRP Kota, District Kota, for the offences under Section 318(4), 316(2), 338, 61(2) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan has already been filed, trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by Magistrate, and therefore, he prays that the petitioners be enlarged on bail as the accused- petitioner Kaushal Sharma and Anupam Chaudhary are in custody since 12.02.2026 and 11.02.2026, respectively.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that allegation against the petitioners is that they had cheated the complainant with around Rs. 2,00,000/- for getting her compassionate appointment in the Railway Department; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past;

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-4456/2026] trial will take considerable long time and even the offences are triable by Magistrate, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners - Kaushal Sharma S/o Dhanraj Shringi and (ii) Anupam Choudhary S/o Mohan Choudhary arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.154/2025, Police Station-GRP Kota, District Kota, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; and

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 19/JUBIN