Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/12349/2026 of IMRAN KHAN S/O RASHID KHAN @ RASEED, Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12349/2026 CNR: RJHC020758782026 | URN: CRLMB / 22779U / 2026 Imran Khan S/o Rashid Khan @ Raseed, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bhaunri, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12349/2026

CNR: RJHC020758782026 | URN: CRLMB / 22779U / 2026

Imran Khan S/o Rashid Khan @ Raseed, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bhaunri, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Surendra Singh with

Mr Anoop Kumar

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

10/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 14.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Kama, District-Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.977/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.166/2026, Police Station-Pahari, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125, 324(4) & 333 of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the offences except offence under Section 333 of the BNS, 2023 are bailable offences.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan has been filed and the conclusion of trial will take

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12349/2026] sufficiently long time. He also submits that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11356/2026 and the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the co-accused. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2026.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that the challan has been filed; all the offences except an offence under Section 333 of the BNS, 2023 are bailable offences; the petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2026; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court; the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the co-accused, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Imran Khan S/o Rashid Khan @ Raseed arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.166/2026, Police Station-Pahari, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12349/2026] Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/99

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead