Rajasthan High Court
CCP/999/2023 of SUDARSHANA BAGDA WIFE OF SHRI MANI BHADRA BAGDA Vs SMT. NALINI KATHOTIA SECRETARY on 7 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 999/2023 CNR: RJHC020862972023 | URN: CCP / 1045U / 2023 Sudarshana Bagda Wife Of Shri Mani Bhadra Bagda, Aged About 69 Years, R/o B-99- A , University Road, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Nalini Kathotia
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 999/2023
CNR: RJHC020862972023 | URN: CCP / 1045U / 2023
Sudarshana Bagda Wife Of Shri Mani Bhadra Bagda, Aged About 69 Years, R/o B-99-A, University Road, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Nalini Kathotia Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Virendra Singh Bhati Deputy Commissioner Zone-Vii, Jaipur Development Authority Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankul Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kuri with
Mr. Shanti Lal Bishnoi
Mr. Dharma Ram, Ms. Nandini Mirdha
& Mr. Ayush Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
07/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 16.05.2023 passed by the Court.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by order dated 16.05.2023, in para No.13 the Court has directed JDA to allot the Plot No.124A to the respondent No.1 therein.
3. Mr. Amit Kuri, learned counsel appearing for the JDA has placed before this Court the allotment letter dated 25.02.2026 and a letter dated 15.05.2026 alongwith site plan of the Plot No.124A.
(2 of 3) [CCP-999/2023] The allotment letter dated 25.02.2026 as well as the letter dated 15.05.2026 are taken on record.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the JDA submits that by issuing allotment letter and the site plan, the respondents may make substantial compliance of the order. He also submits that D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.177/2024 is pending before the Division Bench and therefore, so as to avoid future complications, the JDA has inserted provisions in the allotment letter that the said allotment shall not be transferable, till disposal of the appeal.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that putting the condition that the allotment shall not be transferable is a clear disobedience of the Court’s order.
6. The Court has directed the JDA to make allotment of Plot No.124A to the petitioner herein. The respondents have made allotment of Plot No.124A vide order dated 25.02.2026 in the name of the petitioner and have also issued site plan of the said plot. In opinion of this Court, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order dated 16.05.2026.
7. As regards the submission of counsel for the petitioner that the respondents are illegal and arbitrary manner put a condition in the allotment letter dated 25.02.2026 that the patta shall not be transferable insofar as disposal of the D.B. Special (Writ) is concerned, the Court feels that the said condition is just and proper so as to void future complications in view of the fact that the matter regarding allotment and so also the alleged facility area is sub-judice before the Division Bench.
8. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
(3 of 3) [CCP-999/2023]
9. Contempt notices stand discharged.
10. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J 151/Ashish Kumar