Rajasthan High Court
CCP/171/2025 of SAURABH SINGH S/O SATYAPRAKASH Vs SHRI KRISHAN KUNAL on 7 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 171/2025 CNR: RJHC020134452025 | URN: CCP / 184U / 2025 Saurabh Singh S/o Satyaprakash, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Nahar Ka Bas,kasot, Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Krishan Kunal,
[2026:RJ-JP:31120]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 171/2025
CNR: RJHC020134452025 | URN: CCP / 184U / 2025
Saurabh Singh S/o Satyaprakash, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Nahar Ka Bas,kasot, Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Krishan Kunal, Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2.
Shri Sitaram Jat, Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
3.
Pratibha Verma, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad,jaipur
4.
Shri Jagdish Meena, District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Jaipur
5.
Dr. Bhagchand Badhal, Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan
6.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Iliyas Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with
Ms. Ritika Naruka and
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar
Mr. Nalin G. Narain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
07/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 22.11.2024.
[2026:RJ-JP:31120] (2 of 2) [CCP-171/2025]
2. Mr. S.S. Naruka, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Nalin G. Narain appearing for the respondents, submit that compliance of the order has been made as the respondents have already issued an appointment order dated 06.08.2026 in favour of the petitioner.
3. In view of the fact that the appointment order has already been issued, this Court feels that the substantial compliance has been made of the order by the respondents, hence, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
4. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed of.
5. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 86/ARTI SHARMA