Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/9097/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR SON OF KALLARAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 7 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9097/2026 CNR: RJHC020558082026 | URN: CRLMB / 16661U / 2026 Rakesh Kumar Son Of Kallaram, Aged About 18 Years 10 Months, Resident Of Mohanpura, Ps Balghat, Dist Karauli, Raj. Presently Confined In District
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9097/2026
CNR: RJHC020558082026 | URN: CRLMB / 16661U / 2026
Rakesh Kumar Son Of Kallaram, Aged About 18 Years 10 Months, Resident Of Mohanpura, Ps Balghat, Dist Karauli, Raj. Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Fateh Ram Meena
Mr. Akash Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
07/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.06.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Hindaun City, District- Karauli, in Criminal Misc. (Bail Application) No. 413/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.110/2026, Police Station-Balghat, District Karauli, for the offences under Section 316(2), 318(4) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's bank account has been used in connection with the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9097/2026] commission of an offence, and that an amount of less than Rs.1,03,000/- was credited to the petitioner's account.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in this case has been filed, trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by Magistrate, and therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 27.05.2026.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past; trial will take considerable long time; challan has already been filed and even the offences are triable by Magistarte, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Rakesh Kumar Son Of Kallaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.110/2026, Police Station- Balghat, Distt. Karauli, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9097/2026] called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 38/JUBIN