Rajasthan High Court
CCP/2394/2018 of MOHAN LAL SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMNATH SHARMA Vs SHRI KESAR LAL MEENA REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN on 7 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 2394/2018 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6119/2017 CNR: RJHC021078922018 | URN: CCP / 2454U / 2018 Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ramnath Sharma, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Dhani Nai Kothi Vill. Moriza Tehsil Chomu Jaipur (Raj)
[2026:RJ-JP:31116]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 2394/2018
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6119/2017
CNR: RJHC021078922018 | URN: CCP / 2454U / 2018
Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ramnath Sharma, Aged About 70
Years, R/o Dhani Nai Kothi Vill. Moriza Tehsil Chomu Jaipur (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Kesar Lal Meena Registrar University Of Rajasthan, J.l.n. Marg Jaipur
2.
Shri Kalu Ram, Registrar, University Of Rajasthan, J.l.n.
Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ajay Chaudhary through Video
Conferencing
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rachit Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
07/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 15.11.2017.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that appropriate orders have been passed by the respondent university for extending the due benefits, as ordered by the Court. He has placed before this Court the order dated 25.03.2026 and so also the statement and the photocopy of a cheque in the name of the petitioner. He further submits that he is not in contact with the petitioner, and, therefore, could not verify this fact.
[2026:RJ-JP:31116] (2 of 2) [CCP-2394/2018]
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents and the documents placed on record, which are taken on record, the present contempt petition is disposed off as the respondents have already complied with the order passed by the Court.
4. In case, the petitioner finds that certain grievances remain to be settled, then he may avail the appropriate remedy available to him under law.
5. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed of.
6. The contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 81/ARTI SHARMA