Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1411/2025 of SIYARAM MALI SON OF SHRI MORPAL MALI, Vs SHRI KRISHAN KUNAL, on 6 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1411/2025 CNR: RJHC021116152025 | URN: CCP / 1508U / 2025 Siyaram Mali Son Of Shri Morpal Mali, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of C-105, Land Mark City, Kunhadi, Kota (Raj.) Presently Working As Principal, Government Sr.
[2026:RJ-JP:30811]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1411/2025
CNR: RJHC021116152025 | URN: CCP / 1508U / 2025
Siyaram Mali Son Of Shri Morpal Mali, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of C-105, Land Mark City, Kunhadi, Kota (Raj.)
Presently Working As Principal, Government Sr. Secondary School, Satheli, Block Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Krishan Kunal, Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Archana Singh, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Shri Manish Goyal, Joint Secretary, Department, Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
Shri Sitaram Jat, Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan Bikaner.
5.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt.
Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. R.K. Gautam
Mr. G.S. Gautam
Ms. Saakshi Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, assisted by
Ms. Pooja Sharma
Mr. Vishal Kumar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 16.07.2025, the respondents have decided the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 30.04.2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:30811] (2 of 2) [CCP-1411/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed liberty to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum. In view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided by the respondents, this contempt petition is disposed off, with liberty as prayed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/53