Rajasthan High Court
CW/588/2026 of SANDEEP DHANKHAR, S/O SHRI KULDEEP DHANKAR Vs GAUTAM CHAND GALADA, S/O SHRI INDERCHAND GALADA on 6 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 588/2026 CNR: RJHC020007722026 | URN: CW / 1268U / 2026 Sandeep Dhankhar, S/o Shri Kuldeep Dhankar, Aged About 49 Years, Resident of Suchita Sadan, New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-302020 ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:30734]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 588/2026
CNR: RJHC020007722026 | URN: CW / 1268U / 2026
Sandeep Dhankhar, S/o Shri Kuldeep Dhankar, Aged About 49
Years, Resident of Suchita Sadan, New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-302020
----Petitioner
Versus
Gautam Chand Galada, S/o Shri Inderchand Galada, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of 3, Perianiyagkaran Street, Chennai - 600079
Sidharth Galada, S/o Late Sh. Gyanchand Galada, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of 3, Perianiyagkaran Street, Chennai - 600079
Nagar Nigam, Lalkothi, Jaipur Through Mayor
Kuldeep Dhankhar Shri Gokul Chand Dhankhar, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of 897, Gautam Marg, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur-39 (Substituted By Petitioner-Defendant Vide Order Dated 03.10.2025)
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4654/2025
CNR: RJHC020269492025 | URN: CW / 11669U / 2025
Kuldeep Dhankhar S/o Shri Gokul Chand Dhankar, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of 897, Gautam Marg, Niraman Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 39.
----Petitioner
Versus
Gautam Chand Galada S/o Shri Inderchand Galada, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of 3, Perianiyagkaran Street, Chennai-600079.
Sidharth Galada S/o Late Sh. Gyanchand Galada, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of 3, Perianiyagkaran Street, Chennai-600079.
Nagar Nigam, Lalkothi, Jaipur Through Mayor.
----Respondents
[2026:RJ-JP:30734]
(2 of 2)
[CW-588/2026]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Tisha Sharma for
Ms. Sukriti Kasliwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/08/2026
1. Counsel appearing on behalf of both parties jointly submit that parties have amicably entered into settlement and in that view, they want to get decide the suit itself finally and do not want to press the impugned order and seek permission to withdraw these writ petitions.
2. In view of above, writ petitions are permitted to be withdrawn and are hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Interim stay order dated 27.02.2026 stands vacated.
4. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 33-34/NITIN