Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1272/2026 of RAJENDRA KUMAR TAILOR S/O BAJRANG LAL TAILOR, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1272/2026 CNR: RJHC020718422026 | URN: CCP / 1327U / 2026 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1677/2025 Rajendra Kumar Tailor S/o Bajrang Lal Tailor, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Dev Charan Niwana, Tehsil Chomun,
[2026:RJ-JP:30525]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1272/2026
CNR: RJHC020718422026 | URN: CCP / 1327U / 2026
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1677/2025
Rajendra Kumar Tailor S/o Bajrang Lal Tailor, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Dev Charan Niwana, Tehsil Chomun, District Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director, Medical And Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
4.
Dr. Mrinal Joshi, Superintendent Of Sawai Man Singh Hospital, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ashutosh Chauhan
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner in view of non compliance of the order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition no.1677/2025.
2. Heard.
[2026:RJ-JP:30525] (2 of 2) [CCP-1272/2026]
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. By the order dated 24.03.2026, the writ petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file representation.
5. The contempt proceedings can be initiated against any authority or person and can be punished in case that authority or person is found to have made deliberate disobedience of the Court orders/directions.
6. In the order dated 24.03.2026, there is no direction by the Court for the respondents herein.
7. Since, there is no direction by the Court to be complied with, no contempt proceedings can be initiated against the respondents.
8. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 42/ARTI SHARMA