Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1224/2024 of SHAHEEN AKTHAR W/O LATE SHRI TUFEIL AHMED, Vs ARUN KUMAR HASIZA on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1224/2024 CNR: RJHC021078932024 | URN: CCP / 1317U / 2024 Shaheen Akthar W/o Late Shri Tufeil Ahmed, Aged About 80 Years, Resident Of 4597, Sanjay Market, Jaipur District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Arun
[2026:RJ-JP:30608]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1224/2024
CNR: RJHC021078932024 | URN: CCP / 1317U / 2024
Shaheen Akthar W/o Late Shri Tufeil Ahmed, Aged About 80
Years, Resident Of 4597, Sanjay Market, Jaipur District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Arun Kumar Hasiza, Commissioner Municipal Corporation (Heritage) Jaipur, Jalebi Chowk, Jaipur, District Jaipur.
2.
Sudhansh Pant, Chief Secretary Rajasthan Government The State Of Rajasthan Through Secretariat C-Scheme, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s)
:
None
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 29.01.2024.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner.
3. By the order dated 29.01.2024, the Court disposed off the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to decide the pending representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.
4. The respondents have filed the reply and stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected
[2026:RJ-JP:30608] (2 of 2) [CCP-1224/2024] vide order dated 11.02.2025. The copy of order dated 11.02.2025 has also been placed on record as Annexure-R-1.
5. In view of the fact that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents vide order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure-R-1), this Court is of the opinion that the respondents have complied the order/direction given vide order dated 29.01.2024.
6. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed.
7. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/111