Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/7836/2026 of SACHIN SAIN S/O KALUWA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7836/2026 CNR: RJHC020476332026 | URN: CRLMB / 14294U / 2026 Sachin Sain S/o Kaluwa, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Aau Gate, Deeg, District Deeg, (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7836/2026
CNR: RJHC020476332026 | URN: CRLMB / 14294U / 2026
Sachin Sain S/o Kaluwa, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Aau Gate, Deeg, District Deeg, (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr NC Sharma
Ms. Muskan Bhurat
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
05/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 11.05.2026, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, District-Deeg in Criminal Misc. Case No. 123/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.113/2026, Police Station-Deeg, District-Deeg for the offences under Section 318(2), 318(4), 338 of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of having committed any similar offence or any other nature in past.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. Moreover, even the offences are triable by
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7836/2026] the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2026.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of having committed any similar offence or any other nature in past; challan has already been filed; offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take considerably long time and therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Sachin Sain S/o Kaluwa arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.113/2026, Police Station- Deeg, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-7836/2026] suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 13/JUBIN