Rajasthan High Court

CMAP/82/2026 of KHEMCHAND SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAMSWAROOP SHARMA, Vs SHRAVANI DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI BANSHIDHAR, WIFE OF SHRI BABULAL SHARMA, on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 82/2026 In S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.354/2025 CNR: RJHC020245682026 | URN: CMAP / 116U / 2026 Khemchand Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer,

[2026:RJ-JP:30476]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 82/2026

In

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.354/2025

CNR: RJHC020245682026 | URN: CMAP / 116U / 2026

Khemchand Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

Shravani Devi D/o Late Shri Banshidhar, W/o Shri Babulal Sharma, R/o Gram Kanadvaas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, At Present R/o Mehto Ka Bass, Chandlai, Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur Rajasthan.

Ramnarayan S/o Late Shri Banshidhar, R/o Gram Kanadvaas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan..

Rampyari D/o Late Shri Banshidhar W/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, R/o 57, Nada Ke Dhani, Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Sub Registrar, Sanganer Second, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.

Sub Registrar, Bassi Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Bassi, Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur Rajasthan.

Deputy Commissioner, Zone-09, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Indira Circle, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vichitr

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

05/08/2026

1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner for recalling of the order dated 24.02.2026 passed by this Court in Civil Revision Petition No.354/2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from which the revision petition has arisen, is still sub judice,

[2026:RJ-JP:30476] (2 of 2) [CMAP-82/2026] however, due to some bona fide communication error, learned counsel stated that the revenue suit No.160/2024 has been decided, therefore, the revision petition has become infructuous. He further submits that the Original Civil Suit No.48/2024 is still pending adjudication and due to bona fide mistake, incorrect statement was made. He therefore prays that the order dated 24.02.2026 may be recalled and the revision petition may be restored to its original number.

3. Heard.

4. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application and in the interest of justice, the same is allowed.

5. Accordingly, the order dated 24.02.2026 passed by this Court in Civil Revision Petition No.354/2025, is hereby recalled.

6. S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.354/2025 is restored to its original number. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-34

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead