Rajasthan High Court
CW/19924/2025 of KAMLA DHANKAR Vs RITESH SANGHVI, SON OF SUDHIR SANHGVI on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19924/2025 CNR: RJHC021090292025 | URN: CW / 44476U / 2025 Kamla Dhankar, Authorised Signatory, M/s Paramhans Hospitality Private Limited, 724-725, 7Th Floor North Avenue Road Number-9A, Vki Area, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Present
[2026:RJ-JP:30559]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19924/2025
CNR: RJHC021090292025 | URN: CW / 44476U / 2025
Kamla Dhankar, Authorised Signatory, M/s Paramhans Hospitality Private Limited, 724-725, 7Th Floor North Avenue Road Number-9A, Vki Area, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Present Address Office No. 402, 4Th Floor, The Landmark, Plot No. D-38A Ahinsa Circle, Subhash Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Ritesh Sanghvi, Son Of Sudhir Sanhgvi, House No. 503, Colony Ving, Tilak Nagar Area, Chembur, City Mumbai, Power Of Attorney Holder Of Mr. Chintan Pradeep Thakkar Dattani
2.
Ramratan Sharma, Son Of Shri Tulsidas Sharma, Resident Of 1931, Brahma Marg, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur, Power Of Attorney Holder Of Mr. Chintan Pradeep Thakkar Dattani
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankur Jain for
Mr. Kartik Agarwal
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026
1. Counsel for petitioner states that during pendency of present writ petition, the original application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, before the Rent Tribunal has been decided, therefore, in that view, the challenge to the interlocutory order dated 02.12.2025 made in the present petition, has rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
3. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 18