Rajasthan High Court
CCP/529/2026 of MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI HANUMAN PRASAD Vs ARCHANA SINGH, on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 529/2026 CNR: RJHC020287052026 | URN: CCP / 565U / 2026 Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Khatikan Mohalla, Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan (Employee Id Rjjj199523011914).
[2026:RJ-JP:30592]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 529/2026
CNR: RJHC020287052026 | URN: CCP / 565U / 2026
Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 59
Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Khatikan Mohalla, Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan (Employee Id Rjjj199523011914).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Archana Singh, Secretary Department Of Personnel, Govt.
Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur.
2.
Akhil Arora Addl. Chief Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur.
3.
Lekhraj Deputy Secretary, Personnel (Ka-3 / Enquiry)
Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Chelsi Agarwal, AAAG
Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, AAAG
Mr. Aadity Godara
Mr. Arun Kumar, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 11.02.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14341/2025, whereby the suspension order dated 27.03.2025 was quashed and the respondents were directed to reinstate back the petitioner on his post.
[2026:RJ-JP:30592] (2 of 2) [CCP-529/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has been reinstated back on the post subject to the final outcome of the DB Special Appeal preferred by the State against the order dated 11.02.2026.
3. The respondents have issued the order of reinstatement on 06.06.2026, which has been placed on record as Annexure-AA/1.
4. In view of the issuance of order dated 06.06.2026 for reinstatement of the petitioner, this contempt petition is disposed off as no further cause of action survives to continue it.
5. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/95