Rajasthan High Court
CCP/612/2024 of SHRI VISHANU GAUSHALA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 612/2024 CNR: RJHC020576572024 | URN: CCP / 665U / 2024 Shri Vishanu Gaushala, Aged About 87 Years, Through President Shri Gokul Chand Soni S/o Shri Sohan Lal, Village Tamkore, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
[2026:RJ-JP:30596]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 612/2024
CNR: RJHC020576572024 | URN: CCP / 665U / 2024
Shri Vishanu Gaushala, Aged About 87 Years, Through President Shri Gokul Chand Soni S/o Shri Sohan Lal, Village Tamkore, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through, Principal Secretary To The The Government Department Of Animal Husbandry And Gopalan, Secretariat, Jaipur(Raj.).
2.
Shri Vikas Sitaramji Bhale, Principal Secretary To The Government Department Of Animal Husbandry And Gopalan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Dr. Shalini Sharma Director Gopalan, Directorate Of Gopalan, Near Police Head Quarter Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
Dr. Suresh Sura Joint Director, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Gudamod Road No. 3, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5.
Smt. Chinmayee Gopal, District Collector And President District Level Gopalan Committee, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with
Mr. Ashutosh Udawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted the required bills to the respondents and they after verification rejected the claim of the petitioner by issuing order dated 23.07.2024.
[2026:RJ-JP:30596] (2 of 2) [CCP-612/2024] Learned counsel further submits a liberty may be allowed to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 23.07.2024. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 23.07.2024, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the same. Contempt notices stand discharged. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J 89/Ashish Kumar