Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/11196/2026 of INSAF S/O AKBALI @ IKWAL Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11196/2026 CNR: RJHC020665462026 | URN: CRLMB / 20698U / 2026 Insaf S/o Akbali @ Ikwal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kawan Ka Bas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11196/2026

CNR: RJHC020665462026 | URN: CRLMB / 20698U / 2026

Insaf S/o Akbali @ Ikwal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kawan Ka Bas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Surendra Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

05/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 06.07.2026, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Deeg, District- Deeg in Criminal Misc. Case No. 170/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.260/2024, Police Station-Khoh, District-Deeg for the offences under Section 303(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(A) of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, and except offence under Section 317(4) all other offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11196/2026] that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2026.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that one case is reported to be pending against the petitioner of same nature and hence, he submits that stringent condition may be imposed

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that the challan has already been filed; except offence under Section 317(4) all other offences are triable by the Magistrate; trial will take considerably long time but since one similar case is reported to be pending, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted on stringent conditions.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Insaf S/o Akbali @ Ikwal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.260/2024, Police Station- Khoh, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11196/2026]

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer; and

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 74/JUBIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead