Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/8908/2026 of TASLIM S/O HAQMUDDIN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8908/2026 CNR: RJHC020549932026 | URN: CRLMB / 16342U / 2026 Taslim S/o Haqmuddin, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Daurkhi Police Station Firozpur Jhirka District Nuh Mewat (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Sub

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8908/2026

CNR: RJHC020549932026 | URN: CRLMB / 16342U / 2026

Taslim S/o Haqmuddin, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Daurkhi Police Station Firozpur Jhirka District Nuh Mewat (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Sanjay Khan

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

Mr. Ghanshayam Singh, ASI, PS

Pahadi, Distt. Deeg

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

04/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 01.06.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kama, District- Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No. 808/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2026, Police Station-Pahadi, for the offences under Section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1), 324(4), 303(2) BNS, 2023 and Section 4/21 Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,1957.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past. He further submits that there is nothing on record which could attribute

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8908/2026] injury of any nature to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that challan has ready been filed and the conclusion of the trial will take considerable long time. He further submits that the co-accused namely Ilyash has also been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.07.2026.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except offence under Section 109(1)of BNS,2023 all other offences are triable by Magistrate. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 22.05.2025.

4. The Investigating Officer is present in person.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past; trial will take considerable long time; the petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2026; challan has already been filed and further the fact that except offence under Section 109(1) of BNS, 2023 all other offences are triable by Magistrate and further that no injury is attributed to the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Taslim S/o Haqmuddin arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2026, Police Station-Pahadi, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8908/2026] Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 25/JUBIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead