Rajasthan High Court
CR/306/2026 of VIVEK SHARMA Vs DATARAM on 4 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 306/2026 CNR: RJHC020641062026 | URN: CR / 511U / 2026 1. Vivek Sharma, S/o Late Satyadev Sharma 2. Mayank Sharma, S/o Late Satyadev Sharma 3. Kanchan Sharma, D/o Late Satyadev Sharma 4. Uma Sharma W/o Late Satyadev
[2026:RJ-JP:30248]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 306/2026
CNR: RJHC020641062026 | URN: CR / 511U / 2026
1.
Vivek Sharma, S/o Late Satyadev Sharma
2.
Mayank Sharma, S/o Late Satyadev Sharma
3.
Kanchan Sharma, D/o Late Satyadev Sharma
4.
Uma Sharma W/o Late Satyadev Sharma, All Resident Of Mohalla Bachhdi, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Dataram, S/o Late Indraj
2.
Ramkunwar, S/o Late Hariram
3.
Hanuman S/o Mewaram, All R/o Mohalla Badabas, Kasba Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror Rajasthan.
4.
Ramesh S/o Shri Raghuveer Chouhan, R/o Mohalla Buchaheda, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
5.
Omprakash S/o Late Shri Rameshwar, R/o Mohalla Bachhdi, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror , Rajasthan.
6.
Ramkunwar S/o Shri Mangturam, R/o Village Tapri, Tehsil Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
7.
Anjani Kumar S/o Late Ramjilal Sharma, R/o Chaturbhuj, R/o Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
8.
Rajesh Sharma, S/o Late Sumitra
9.
Manisha Sharma, D/o Late Sumitra
10.
Uma Devi W/o Late Satish Sharma, D/o Late Sumitra All R/o 89/6, Babupura, New Labour Colony, Kidwai Nagar, Post Khanpur, Uttar Pradesh.
11.
Sub Registrar, Mahodaya Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
12.
District Collector, District Kotputli-Behror Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Khushal Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)
:
[2026:RJ-JP:30248]
(2 of 2)
[CR-306/2026]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
04/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter at some length, and upon instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present civil revision petition with liberty to raise all the pleas encapsulated in the present revision petition before the learned Court below by way of a written statement in the main suit.
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas encapsulated in the present revision petition before the learned Court below by way of a written statement in the main suit.
4. In case, such pleas are raised, the learned Trial Court is directed to consider the same on merits without being influenced by the impugned order.
5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-16