Rajasthan High Court
SAW/597/2026 of STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs ANIL KUMAR SON OF SHRI GOPAL LAL on 4 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 597/2026 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5898/2020 CNR: RJHC020466522026 | URN: SAW / 1290U / 2026 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Chief
[2026:RJ-JP:30193-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 597/2026
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5898/2020
CNR: RJHC020466522026 | URN: SAW / 1290U / 2026
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Chief Medical And Health Officer (Cmho), Govt.
Hospital Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3.
The Block Chief Medical And Health Officer (Bcmho), Mahuwa, Mahuwa, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan.
4.
The Mission Director, National Health Mission (Nhm) Cum Secretary, To The Govt. For Nhm, Medical Directorate, Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Anil Kumar Son Of Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of House No. 109, Nanu Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur Rajasthan-
302039.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. P.C. Sharma.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
04/08/2026
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants-State challenging the order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5898/2020.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State submits that the termination order of the respondent-
[2026:RJ-JP:30193-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-597/2026] writ petitioner had already been revoked and he had been reinstated in service despite that the learned Single Judge has imposed the costs of Rs.25,000/- and also directed to initiate the proceedings against the concerned erring officer and prayed for setting aside the said directions and waiving the costs of Rs.25,000/-.
3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent - writ petitioner opposed the appeal.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the termination order of the original petitioner had already been revoked by the Department itself, therefore, we deem it just and proper to partly allow the appeal and the cost of Rs.25,000/- as imposed by the learned Single Judge in para No.6(i) and directions issued in para No.6(iii) with regard to initiate appropriate proceedings against the Officers of the Department are set aside. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 40/MG