Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6510/2026 of KULDEEP S/O SHRI LALCHAND Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6510/2026 CNR: RJHC020398772026 | URN: CRLMB / 11710U / 2026 Kuldeep S/o Shri Lalchand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Harmada, P.s. Bandarsindari, District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6510/2026
CNR: RJHC020398772026 | URN: CRLMB / 11710U / 2026
Kuldeep S/o Shri Lalchand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Harmada, P.s. Bandarsindari, District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Devanshu Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 16.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No. 1, Kishangarh, District Ajmer in Criminal Misc. Application No. 107/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.47/2026, Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2)(A) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6510/2026] offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 08.04.2026, which is more than three months.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Kuldeep S/o Shri Lalchand arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.47/2026, Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6510/2026]
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 18/RACHNA