Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8579/2026 of SUNNY S/O KARANSINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8579/2026 CNR: RJHC020527452026 | URN: CRLMB / 15609U / 2026 Sunny S/o Karansingh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Karmooka Bas, Police Station Kama, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8579/2026
CNR: RJHC020527452026 | URN: CRLMB / 15609U / 2026
Sunny S/o Karansingh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Karmooka Bas, Police Station Kama, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8998/2026
CNR: RJHC020546352026 | URN: CRLMB / 16503U / 2026
1.
Jabid S/o Aasin, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
2.
Sohel S/o Jakir, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nandera, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
Mr. Arafat Hussain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 26.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kama, District
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8579/2026] Deeg in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No. 722/2026 and 721/2026 respectively, whereby the bail applications of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 219/2026, Police Station Kama, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody since 03.05.2026.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; offences are triable by magistrate; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8579/2026]
7. Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Sunny S/o Karansing, (ii) Jabid S/o Aasin and (iii) Sohel S/o Jakir arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 219/2026, Police Station Kama District Deeg shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected;
(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 44-45/RACHNA