Rajasthan High Court
CCP/685/2026 of KMODVATI D/O SHRI BALKRISHAN Vs DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 685/2026 CNR: RJHC020393032026 | URN: CCP / 722U / 2026 Kmodvati D/o Shri Balkrishan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Balaji Printers, Behind Dharmshala, Anoopgarh, Sriganganagar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dinesh Kumar
[2026:RJ-JP:29948]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 685/2026
CNR: RJHC020393032026 | URN: CCP / 722U / 2026
Kmodvati D/o Shri Balkrishan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Balaji Printers, Behind Dharmshala, Anoopgarh, Sriganganagar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board State Agriculture Management Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Sh. Krishna Kunal, Principal Secretary, Secretary, Education Department, State Of Rajasthan Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Sh. Sita Ram Jat, Director, Primary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, State Of Rajasthan Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Himanshu Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG, with
Ms. Ritika Naruka
Mr. Nalin G. Narain, with
Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat,
Mr. Manish Bhardwaj
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner in respect of the interim order dated 26.07.2023, whereby the Court directed the respondents to permit the petitioner for document verification and consider her candidature on merits in
[2026:RJ-JP:29948] (2 of 2) [CCP-685/2026] divorce category for the post in question, provisionally subject to final outcome of the writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, which is a recruiting agency, states that considering the claim of the petitioner and to extend the substantial relief in case the petitioner succeeds in the petition, the Board has already made one vacancy reserve for the petitioner.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar.
4. Considering the fact that the respondent-Rajasthan Staff Selection Board has already kept one post vacant for the petitioner in case she succeeds in the writ petition, this Court is of the opinion that the respondents have made substantial compliance of the interim order.
5. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 22/SHRUTI SHARMA