Rajasthan High Court
CR/106/2026 of NARPAT SINGH Vs ARJUN RAM SON OF NARAYAN, on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 106/2026 CNR: RJHC020181882026 | URN: CR / 190U / 2026 1. Narpat Singh, Son Of Jagdish Singh, 2. Bhawani Singh, Of Jagdish Singh, 3. Karni Singh, Son Of Jagdish Singh, 4. Durga Kanwar Wife Of Jagdish Singh, (Since
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 106/2026
CNR: RJHC020181882026 | URN: CR / 190U / 2026
1.
Narpat Singh, Son Of Jagdish Singh,
2.
Bhawani Singh, Of Jagdish Singh,
3.
Karni Singh, Son Of Jagdish Singh,
4.
Durga Kanwar Wife Of Jagdish Singh, (Since Deceased).
5.
Shankar, Son Of Jagdish Singh,
6.
Yudhishthar, Son Of Sajjan Singh,
7.
Lalita Kanwar, Daughter Of Sajjan Singh,
8.
Manoj Kunwar, Daughter Of Sajjan Singh,
9.
Brij Kanwar, Wife Of Sajjan Singh,
All Resident Of Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
10.
Chandra Devi, Wife Of Rameshwar Lal,
11.
Arjun Gurjar, Son Of Rataram,
Both Resident Of Gadwalon Ki Dhani, Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
12.
Krishan Adopted Son Of Granpat Ram, Resident Of Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioners
Versus
Arjun Ram Son Of Narayan, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Sevanagar, Tan Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. G.L.Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. Since impugned order dated 28.01.2026 has been passed by the Court of Gram Nyayalaya, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjunu,
(2 of 2) [CR-106/2026] learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions of his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to take appropriate remedy available in law.
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for.
4. Office is directed to return the vakalatnama and certified copy of the impugned order, after retaining the xerox copy thereof on record. (MANEESH SHARMA),J 158/EKTA